Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738451›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

A Dutch phase III randomized multicenter trial: whole brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiotherapy for 4-10 brain metastases.

Dianne Hartgerink, Anna Bruynzeel, Danielle Eekers, Ans Swinnen, Coen Hurkmans, Ruud Wiggenraad, Annemarie Swaak-Kragten, Edith Dieleman, Peter-Paul van der Toorn, Bing Oei and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02353000 (Whole Brain Radiotherapy vs. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for 4 - 10 Brain Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02353000 naterminatednot on this map

Whole Brain Radiotherapy vs. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for 4 - 10 Brain Metastases:a Phase III Randomized Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht Radiation OncologyRan2016 to 2019Enrolled31ConditionsNeoplasm MetastasisArmsStereotactic Radiosurgery, Whole Brain Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer brain metastasis (2025).Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib and radiotherapyAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Dianne HartgerinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Anna BruynzeelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.
Danielle EekersDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ans SwinnenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Coen HurkmansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Ruud WiggenraadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Annemarie Swaak-KragtenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Edith DielemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.
Peter-Paul van der ToornDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Bing OeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Verbeeten Institute Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Lieneke van VeelenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zuid-West Radiotherapy Institute Vlissingen, the Netherlands.
Joost VerhoeffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Frank LagerwaardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.
Dirk de RuysscherDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jaap ZindlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden MC, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Maastro Clinic · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLGGD Haaglanden · NLInstituut Verbeeten · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical value of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BM) is a matter of debate due to the significant side effects involved. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an attractive alternative treatment option that may avoid these side effects and improve local tumor control. We initiated a randomized trial (NCT02353000) to investigate whether quality of life is better preserved after SRS compared with WBRT in patients with multiple brain metastases.

methodsPatients with 4-10 BM were randomized between the standard arm WBRT (total dose 20 Gy in 5 fractions) or SRS (single fraction or 3 fractions). The primary endpoint was the difference in quality of life (QOL) at 3 months post-treatment.

resultsThe study was prematurely closed due to poor accrual. A total of 29 patients (13%) were randomized, of which 15 patients have been treated with SRS and 14 patients with WBRT. The median number of lesions were 6 (range: 4-9) and the median total treatment volume was 13.0 cc

conclusionIn patients with 4-10 BM, SRS alone resulted in 1-year survival for 57% of patients while maintaining quality of life. Due to the premature closure of the trial, no statistically significant differences could be determined.

Indexed as

brain metastasesquality of lifestereotactic radiotherapywhole brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33738451
PMCPMC7954103
OpenAlexW3128477873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.