Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738439›Full record

ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2021

Summary of animal models of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Weisha Li, Mengyuan Li, Xingjiu Yang, Wenlong Zhang, Lin Cao, Ran Gao

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Humanized mouse models in MDS.Cell death & disease · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Summary of animal models of myelodysplastic syndrome.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weisha LiNHC Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-6067
Mengyuan LiNHC Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine Beijing China.
Xingjiu YangNHC Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine Beijing China.
Wenlong ZhangNHC Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine Beijing China.
Lin CaoBeijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Ran GaoNHC Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine Beijing China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a malignant tumor of the hematological system characterized by long-term, progressive refractory hemocytopenia. In addition, the risk of leukemia is high, and once it develops, the course of acute leukemia is short with poor curative effect. Animal models are powerful tools for studying human diseases and are highly effective preclinical platforms. Animal models of MDS can accurately show genetic aberrations and hematopoietic clone phenotypes with similar cellular features (such as impaired differentiation and increased apoptosis), and symptoms can be used to assess existing treatments. Animal models are also helpful for understanding the pathogenesis of MDS and its relationship with acute leukemia, which helps with the identification of candidate genes related to the MDS phenotype. This review summarizes the current status of animal models used to research myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsGenetic EngineeringHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiceMyelodysplastic SyndromesRatsTransplantation, HeterologousZebrafishanimal modelsLeukemiamyelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

Identifiers

PMID33738439
PMCPMC7954832
OpenAlexW3129080729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.