Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738096›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation

A multicenter retrospective study of patients with pulmonary hypertension transitioned from inhaled to oral treprostinil.

Diane L Zwicke, Ricardo Restrepo-Jaramillo, Hassan Alnuaimat, Kathryn Gordon, Meredith Broderick, Lisa D Edwards, Andrew Allmon, Peter J Leary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Diane L ZwickeAurora St. Luke's Medical Center, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Ricardo Restrepo-JaramilloUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Hassan AlnuaimatDept of Medicine in the College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kathryn GordonUnited Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Meredith BroderickUnited Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Lisa D EdwardsUnited Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-2151
Andrew AllmonUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Peter J LearyUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Triangle · USAurora St. Luke's Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral treprostinil has recently been shown to delay disease progression in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in a long-term outcomes study. The potential advantages of an oral formulation have resulted in patients transitioning from inhaled to oral treprostinil. The current study reports a retrospective analysis of patients who transitioned from treatment with inhaled to oral treprostinil. A multicenter retrospective chart review was conducted for 29 patients with pulmonary hypertension that transitioned from inhaled to oral treprostinil. Data were collected from inhaled treprostinil initiation and patients were followed until discontinuation of oral treprostinil or the end of the observation period. Persistence was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Prior to transition to oral treprostinil, patients had received inhaled treprostinil for a median of 643 (IQR: 322-991) days and 52% of patients were New York Heart Association/World Health Organization Functional Class III. For patients that cross-titrated between formulations, the median time to complete the cross titration was 24 (IQR: 1-57) days. At 16- and 24-weeks post-transition, oral treprostinil persistence was 86 and 76%, respectively. Persistence was 59% at 52 weeks post-transition. Clinical stability for the majority of patients at first follow-up post-transition was suggested based on available New York Heart Association/World Health Organization Functional Classification. Transitions from inhaled to oral treprostinil appeared safe and tolerable in the short-term. Additional prospective studies are needed to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of transitions from inhaled to oral treprostinil.

Indexed as

cross titrationinhaled treprostiniloral treprostinilprostacyclin analoguetransition

Identifiers

PMID33738096
PMCPMC7934059
OpenAlexW3130138888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.