Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738024›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2020

Optimal parity cut-off values for predicting postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections.

Yasuhiro Miyoshi, Sanford Khondowe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Multidisciplinary team training in postpartum hemorrhage: impact on the use of blood products.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasuhiro MiyoshiZimba Mission Hospital, Zimba, Zambia.
Sanford KhondoweZimba Mission Hospital, Zimba, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionhigh parity is a major public health concern in developing countries and it is a risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The aim of this study was to analyze the optimal parity cut-off values for predicting PPH in vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections in a rural Zambian setting.

methodsall women who delivered at Zimba Mission Hospital in 2017 were reviewed in this retrospective survey. Those whose records were missing data on parity and those with risk factors for developing PPH (e.g. birth weight ≥4,000 g, multiple pregnancy, assisted vaginal delivery and placenta previa) were excluded. We analyzed the association between parity and PPH using multiple logistic regression and ROC curve analyses.

resultsamong the 1,555 women included in the study, 72 (4.6%) women experienced PPH. The optimal cut-off values for parity in vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections were para 7 and 3, respectively. Using these cut-off values, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 3.26 (1.15, 9.21) and 8.28 (2.25, 30.5), respectively.

conclusionproper preparation is required for vaginal deliveries in women with a history of ≥7 births and cesarean sections in women with a history of ≥3 births.

Indexed as

ParityAdultCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultZambiacut-off valuehigh paritypostpartum hemorrhagerisk factorZambia

Identifiers

PMID33738024
PMCPMC7934203
OpenAlexW3112341757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.