Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737956›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2021

Off-label use of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a critical appraisal of randomized and real-world evidence.

Georgios Tsivgoulis, Odysseas Kargiotis, Gianmarco De Marchis, Martin Kohrmann, Else Charlotte Sandset, Theodore Karapanayiotides, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Amrou Sarraj, Apostolos Safouris, Klearchos Psychogios and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  4. When thrombus meets intracranial dissection: a tricky decision for intravenous thrombolysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. When an incidental finding should not stop acute stroke treatment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Georgios TsivgoulisSecond Department of Neurology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Iras 39, Gerakas Attikis, Athens 15344, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-3797
Odysseas KargiotisStroke Unit, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Gianmarco De MarchisNeurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital of Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin KohrmannDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Else Charlotte SandsetDepartment of Neurology, Stroke Unit, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Theodore KarapanayiotidesDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Diana Aguiar de SousaDepartment of Neurosciences (Neurology), Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Amrou SarrajDepartment of Neurology, The University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Apostolos SafourisSecond Department of Neurology, National & Kapodistiran University of Athens, School of Medicine, "Attikon" University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Klearchos PsychogiosStroke Unit, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3993-2545
Konstantinos VadikoliasDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, School of Medicine, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Didier LeysDepartment of Neurology (Stroke Unit), Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, Degenerative and Vascular Cognitive Disorders, University of Lille, INSERM (U-1172), Lille, France.
Peter D SchellingerDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, UK RUB Minden, Germany.
Andrei V AlexandrovDepartment of Neurology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8871-1023
Metropolitan Hospital · GRUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRDemocritus University of Thrace · GREssen University Hospital · DEInserm · FRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GROslo University Hospital · NOUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) represents the only systemic reperfusion therapy able to reverse neurological deficit in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite its effectiveness in patients with or without large vessel occlusion, it can be offered only to a minority of them, because of the short therapeutic window and additional contraindications derived from stringent but arbitrary inclusion and exclusion criteria used in landmark randomized controlled clinical trials. Many absolute or relative contraindications lead to disparities between the official drug label and guidelines or expert recommendations. Based on recent advances in neuroimaging and evidence from cohort studies, off-label use of IVT is increasingly incorporated into the daily practice of many stroke centers. They relate to extension of therapeutic time windows, and expansion of indications in co-existing conditions originally listed in exclusion criteria, such as use of alternative thrombolytic agents, pre-treatment with antiplatelets, anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparins. In this narrative review, we summarize recent randomized and real-world data on the safety and efficacy of off-label use of IVT for AIS. We also make some practical recommendations to stroke physicians regarding the off-label use of thrombolytic agents in complex and uncommon presentations of AIS or other conditions mimicking acute cerebral ischemia. Finally, we provide guidance on the risks and benefits of IVT in numerous AIS subgroups, where equipoise exists and guidelines and treatment practices vary.

Indexed as

alteplasecontraindicationsintracranial bleedingintravenous thrombolysisischemic strokelarge vessel occlusionoff-labeltenecteplasetherapeutic window

Identifiers

PMID33737956
PMCPMC7934037
OpenAlexW3134232206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.