Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737859›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical organization theory2020

To illuminate and motivate: A fuzzy-trace model of the spread of information online.

David A Broniatowski, Valerie F Reyna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical organization theory, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Barriers to Online Dementia Information and Mitigation.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2022
    Article
  7. Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2021
    Article
  8. News Feature: Finding a vaccine for misinformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David A BroniatowskiThe George Washington University.
Valerie F ReynaCornell University.

Funding

Supplementing Survey-Based Analyses of Group Vaccination Narratives and Behaviors Using Social MediaR01GM114771 · NIGMS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRONIATOWSKI, DAVID ANDRE, QUINN, SANDRA CROUSE · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose, and test, a model of online media platform users' decisions to act on, and share, received information. Specifically, we focus on how

Indexed as

GistMisinformationTwitterVaccinesVerbatim

Identifiers

PMID33737859
PMCPMC7962747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.