Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737804›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2021

Withanone from

Acharya Balkrishna, Subarna Pokhrel, Hoshiyar Singh, Monali Joshi, Vallabh Prakash Mulay, Swati Haldar, Anurag Varshney

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Small Fish, Big Answers: Zebrafish and the Molecular Drivers of Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Extraction of Bioactive Compounds FromInternational journal of food science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emerging Vistas for the NutraceuticalPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Steroidal lactones fromIn silico pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Acharya BalkrishnaDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Subarna PokhrelDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Hoshiyar SinghDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Monali JoshiDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Vallabh Prakash MulayDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Swati HaldarDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Anurag VarshneyDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, 249405, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8509-0882
Patanjali Research Foundation · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSARS-CoV-2 engages human ACE2 through its spike (S) protein receptor binding domain (RBD) to enter the host cell. Recent computational studies have reported that withanone and withaferin A, phytochemicals found in

aimThis study aimed at in silico exploration, along with in vitro and in vivo validation of antiviral efficacy of the phytochemical withanone.

methodsThrough molecular docking, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation and electrostatic energy calculation the plausible biochemical interactions between withanone and the ACE2-RBD complex were investigated. These in silico observations were biochemically validated by ELISA-based assays. Withanone-enriched extract from

resultsWithanone bound efficiently at the interacting interface of the ACE2-RBD complex and destabilized it energetically. The electrostatic component of binding free energies of the complex was significantly decreased. The two intrachain salt bridge interactions (K31-E35) and the interchain long-range ion-pair (K31-E484), at the ACE2-RBD interface were completely abolished by withanone, in the 50 ns simulation. In vitro binding assay experimentally validated that withanone efficiently inhibited (IC

conclusionIn conclusion, this study provided experimental validation for computational insight into the potential of withanone as a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus entry into the host cells.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentWithaniaA549 CellsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19Disease Models, AnimalEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMaleMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antiviral AgentsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHSPA5 protein, humanSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2WithanolideswithanoneACE2-RBD complexdocking and MD simulationELISAhumanized zebrafish modelSARS-CoV-2 S-proteinWithania somniferawithanone

Identifiers

PMID33737804
PMCPMC7961299
OpenAlexW3133896203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.