Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737436›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Lifelines COVID-19 cohort: investigating COVID-19 infection and its health and societal impacts in a Dutch population-based cohort.

Katherine Mc Intyre, Pauline Lanting, Patrick Deelen, Henry H Wiersma, Judith M Vonk, Anil P S Ori, Soesma A Jankipersadsing, Robert Warmerdam, Irene van Blokland, Floranne Boulogne and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Productivity changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated risk factors.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Katherine Mc IntyreDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-2920
Pauline Lanting *Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7288-4445
Patrick Deelen *Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5654-3966
Henry H Wiersma *Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-1197
Judith M Vonk *Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-4547
Anil P S Ori *Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0579-0905
Soesma A Jankipersadsing *Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-9236
Robert WarmerdamDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8691-0053
Irene van BloklandDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-8015
Floranne BoulogneDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5893-1401
Marjolein X L DijkemaDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johanna C HerkertDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-9102
Annique ClaringbouldDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-6557
Olivier BakkerDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-1327
Esteban A Lopera MayaDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-3938
Ute BültmannDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-9220
Alexandra ZhernakovaDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-0841
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-7523
Elianne ZijlstraDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9845-614X
Morris A SwertzDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-3401
Sandra BrouwerDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Raun van OoijenDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-5568
Viola AngeliniFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5177-3447
Louise H DekkerFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anna SijtsmaLifelines Cohort Study, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sicco A ScherjonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-1235
Cisca WijmengaDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-1614
Jackie A M DekensDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jochen MierauFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9968-8807
H Marike BoezenDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4320-1481
Lude FrankeDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands l.h.franke@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-8802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Lifelines COVID-19 cohort was set up to assess the psychological and societal impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and investigate potential risk factors for COVID-19 within the Lifelines prospective population cohort.

participantsParticipants were recruited from the 140 000 eligible participants of Lifelines and the Lifelines NEXT birth cohort, who are all residents of the three northern provinces of the Netherlands. Participants filled out detailed questionnaires about their physical and mental health and experiences on a weekly basis starting in late March 2020, and the cohort consists of everyone who filled in at least one questionnaire in the first 8 weeks of the project. FINDINGS TO DATE: >71 000 unique participants responded to the questionnaires at least once during the first 8 weeks, with >22 000 participants responding to seven questionnaires. Compiled questionnaire results are continuously updated and shared with the public through the Corona Barometer website. Early results included a clear signal that younger people living alone were experiencing greater levels of loneliness due to lockdown, and subsequent results showed the easing of anxiety as lockdown was eased in June 2020. FUTURE PLANS: Questionnaires were sent on a (bi)weekly basis starting in March 2020 and on a monthly basis starting July 2020, with plans for new questionnaire rounds to continue through 2020 and early 2021. Questionnaire frequency can be increased again for subsequent waves of infections. Cohort data will be used to address how the COVID-19 pandemic developed in the northern provinces of the Netherlands, which environmental and genetic risk factors predict disease susceptibility and severity and the psychological and societal impacts of the crisis. Cohort data are linked to the extensive health, lifestyle and sociodemographic data held for these participants by Lifelines, a 30-year project that started in 2006, and to data about participants held in national databases.

Indexed as

PandemicsAdultAnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19FemaleHumansLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19epidemiologygeneticsmental healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID33737436
PMCPMC7977080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.