Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737340›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Fast progression in non-small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel.

David Gandara, Martin Reck, Denis Moro-Sibilot, Julien Mazieres, Shirish Gadgeel, Stefanie Morris, Andres Cardona, Diana Mendus, Marcus Ballinger, Achim Rittmeyer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02008227 (A Phase III, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02008227 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) Compared With Docetaxel in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure With Platinum Containing Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2014 to 2019Enrolled1,225ConditionsNon-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung CancerArmsAtezolizumab, Docetaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

David GandaraDepartment of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California, USA drgandara@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1784-048X
Martin ReckLungen Clinic, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Denis Moro-SibilotThoracic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Julien MazieresThoracic Oncology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5921-7613
Shirish GadgeelDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Stefanie MorrisProduct Development Medical Affairs Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Andres CardonaProduct Development Biometrics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Diana MendusProduct Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Marcus BallingerProduct Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Achim RittmeyerThoracic Oncology, Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Immenhausen, Germany.
Solange PetersDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRGerman Center for Lung Research · DEHenry Ford Health System · USThoracic Surgery Foundation · USUC Davis Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment-induced accelerated tumor growth is a progression pattern reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors that has never been evaluated in randomized phase III studies because it requires two pretreatment scans. This study aimed to develop clinically relevant and applicable criteria for fast progression (FP), incorporating tumor growth kinetics and early death from disease progression to analyze data from the randomized phase III OAK study.

methodsThe OAK study evaluated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus docetaxel as second-line or third-line treatment for stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer. FP rates and associated baseline factors were analyzed. FP was defined as either a ≥50% increase in the sum of largest diameters (SLDs) within 6 weeks of treatment initiation or death due to cancer progression within 12 weeks (absent post-baseline scan).

resultsForty-two of 421 patients (10%) receiving atezolizumab and 37 of 402 (9%) receiving docetaxel had FP. Twenty patients with FP (48%) receiving atezolizumab versus 12 (30%) receiving docetaxel had a ≥50% SLD increase within 6 weeks. FP was significantly associated with an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 1 (vs 0), ≥3 metastatic sites at baseline, and failure of preceding first-line treatment within 6 months, but not with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 or tumor mutational burden. Overall survival in patients with FP and a ≥50% SLD increase at week 6 was similar with atezolizumab and docetaxel (unstratified HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.92)).

conclusionsFP rates were similar with atezolizumab and docetaxel in the OAK study, suggesting that FP may not be unique to checkpoint inhibitors, although the underlying mechanisms may differ from those of chemotherapy. Applying the FP criteria to other phase III checkpoint inhibitor trials may further elucidate the risk factors for FP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02008227.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease ProgressionDocetaxelFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabDocetaxelImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTubulin Modulatorsimmunotherapylung neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33737340
PMCPMC7978260
OpenAlexW3138581479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.