Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737298›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2021

Long-term Patterns of Excess Mortality among Endometrial Cancer Survivors.

Chelsea Anderson, Victoria L Bae-Jump, Russell R Broaddus, Andrew F Olshan, Hazel B Nichols

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chelsea AndersonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. cea39@email.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6535-481X
Victoria L Bae-JumpDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Russell R BroaddusDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Hazel B NicholsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-1560

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated excess mortality after endometrial cancer using conditional relative survival estimates and standardized mortality ratios (SMR).

methodsWomen diagnosed with endometrial cancer during 2000-2017 ( POPULATION: Five-year relative survival was estimated at diagnosis and each additional year survived up to 12 years post-diagnosis, conditional on survival up to that year.

resultsFor the full cohort, 5-year relative survival was 87.7%, 96.2%, and 97.1% at 1, 5, and 10 years post-diagnosis, respectively. Conditional 5-year relative survival first exceeded 95%, reflecting minimal excess mortality compared with the general population, at 4 years post-diagnosis overall. However, in subgroup analyses, conditional relative survival remained lower for Black women (vs. White) and for those with regional/distant stage disease (vs. localized) throughout the study period. The overall SMR for all-cause mortality decreased from 5.90 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.81-5.99] in the first year after diagnosis to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.13-1.19) at 10+ years; SMRs were consistently higher for non-White women and for those with higher stage or grade disease.

conclusionsOverall, endometrial cancer survivors had only a small survival deficit beyond 4 years post-diagnosis. However, excess mortality was greater in magnitude and persisted longer into survivorship for Black women and for those with more advanced disease. IMPACT: Strategies to mitigate disparities in mortality after endometrial cancer will be needed as the number of survivors continues to increase.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathHealth Status DisparitiesAdolescentAdultAgedBlack PeopleCancer SurvivorsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSEER ProgramTime FactorsWhite PeopleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33737298
PMCPMC8172460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.