Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737269›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

MR-Eye: High-Resolution Microscopy Coil MRI for the Assessment of the Orbit and Periorbital Structures, Part 2: Clinical Applications.

N W Dobbs, M J Budak, R D White, I A Zealley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N W DobbsFrom the Department of Clinical Neuroscience (N.W.D.), Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK nicholas.dobbs@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6225-1890
M J BudakQscan Radiology Clinics (M.J.B.), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-1988
R D WhiteDepartment of Clinical Radiology (R.D.W.), University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2370-4575
I A ZealleyDepartment of Clinical Radiology (I.A.Z.), Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-9071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first part of this 2-part series, we described how to implement microscopy coil MR imaging of the orbits. Beyond being a useful anatomic educational tool, microscopy coil MR imaging has valuable applications in clinical practice. By depicting deep tissue tumor extension, which cannot be evaluated clinically, ophthalmic surgeons can minimize the surgical field, preserve normal anatomy when possible, and maximize the accuracy of resection margins. Here we demonstrate common and uncommon pathologies that may be encountered in orbital microscopy coil MR imaging practice and discuss the imaging appearance, the underlying pathologic processes, and the clinical relevance of the microscopy coil MR imaging findings.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingOrbitHumansMicroscopyOrbital Diseases

Identifiers

PMID33737269
PMCPMC8324274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.