Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737232›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2021

Atrial resting membrane potential confers sodium current sensitivity to propafenone, flecainide and dronedarone.

Andrew P Holmes, Priyanka Saxena, S Nashitha Kabir, Christopher O'Shea, Stefan M Kuhlmann, Suranjana Gupta, Dannie Fobian, Clara Apicella, Molly O'Reilly, Fahima Syeda and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transforming atrial fibrillation management by targeting comorbidities and reducing atrial fibrillation burden: the 10th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms,International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Early Atrial Remodeling Drives Arrhythmia in Fabry Disease.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ablation and antiarrhythmic drug effects onFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew P HolmesInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.p.holmes@bham.ac.uk.
Priyanka SaxenaInstitute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
S Nashitha KabirInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Christopher O'SheaInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Stefan M KuhlmannInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Suranjana GuptaInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Computational Neurophysiology Lab, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Dannie FobianInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Clara ApicellaInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Equipe Gametes to Birth, Institut Cochin, U1016 INSERM, Paris, France.
Molly O'ReillyInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Fahima SyedaInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jasmeet S ReyatInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Godfrey L SmithInstitute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Antony J WorkmanInstitute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Davor PavlovicInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Larissa FabritzInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Paulus KirchhofInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEInserm · FR

Funding

British Heart Foundation AA/18/2/34218British Heart Foundation FS/13/43/30324British Heart Foundation FS/19/12/34204British Heart Foundation FS/19/16/34169British Heart Foundation PG/16/42/32142British Heart Foundation PG/17/30/32961British Heart Foundation PG/17/55/33087British Heart Foundation PG/20/22/35093British Heart Foundation RG/17/15/33106Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 109604/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough atrial fibrillation ablation is increasingly used for rhythm control therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are commonly used, either alone or in combination with ablation. The effectiveness of AADs is highly variable. Previous work from our group suggests that alterations in atrial resting membrane potential (RMP) induced by low Pitx2 expression could explain the variable effect of flecainide.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess whether alterations in atrial/cardiac RMP modify the effectiveness of multiple clinically used AADs.

methodsThe sodium channel blocking effects of propafenone (300 nM, 1 μM), flecainide (1 μM), and dronedarone (5 μM, 10 μM) were measured in human stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes, HEK293 expressing human Na

resultsA more positive atrial RMP delayed I

conclusionAtrial RMP modifies the effectiveness of several clinically used AADs. Dronedarone is more sensitive to changes in atrial RMP than flecainide or propafenone. Identifying and modifying atrial RMP may offer a novel approach to enhancing the effectiveness of AADs or personalizing AAD selection.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial FibrillationDisease Models, AnimalDronedaroneFemaleFlecainideHeart AtriaMaleMembrane PotentialsMicePropafenoneSodiumVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel BlockersAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsDronedaroneFlecainidePropafenoneSodiumVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel BlockersAtrial action potentialAtrial fibrillationDronedaroneFlecainidePITX2PropafenoneResting membrane potential

Identifiers

PMID33737232
PMCPMC8259123
OpenAlexW3137109809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.