Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33736600›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Psychometric properties of a Persian version of respectful maternity care questionnaire.

Mina Esmkhani, Masoumeh Namadian, Ali Nooroozy, Jeffrey E Korte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mina EsmkhaniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-3254
Masoumeh NamadianSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran. m.namadian@zums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7722-7700
Ali NooroozyEducation Development Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2167-9441
Jeffrey E KorteDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-9228

Funding

Vice-Chancellor for Research,Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR) A-11-147-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding high quality and respectful care during pregnancy and birth is one of the ways to reduce complications in women. Respectful care is a type of care that requires a valid instrument to measure. This study was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) questionnaire in 2018.

methodsThis study was performed with 150 women (in the first 48 h after birth), who were admitted in the postpartum wards of public hospitals from 1st January until 6th April 2018 in Zanjan city in Iran. Participants were selected randomly using the Poisson distribution (Time) sampling method. After receiving permission from the questionnaire's author, the internal consistency of the tool was measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient after the Forward translation of the Persian version of the tool under expert supervision. The reliability of the modified questionnaire was assessed using a test-retest method in 10 eligible postpartum women, who completed the same questionnaire again after 72 h. The validity of the tool was confirmed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using LISREL and SPSS software.

resultsThe original RMC tool achieved an overall high internal reliability (α = 0.839). Confirmatory factor analysis of original RMC scores demonstrated poor fit indices. In LISREL proposed paths for the model, one item was excluded and a re-exploratory factor analysis was performed with the remaining 14 items. Four new subscales were defined for the revised tool including Abusive Care, Effective Care, Friendly Care, and Respectful Communication, which explained 60% of the variance.

conclusionsThe revised tool included four subscales of Abusive Care, Effective Care, Friendly Care, and Respectful Communication in 14 items which explained 60% of the variance. Given the importance of providing high quality maternity care, and the variety of cultures and birth services across different countries, further research is needed on this RMC tool to evaluate its use in other countries and regions.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesQuality of Health CareRespectFemaleHumansIranPregnancyPregnant PeoplePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsBirthPsychometricReliabilityRespectful maternity careValidity

Identifiers

PMID33736600
PMCPMC7976705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.