ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2022
Description of a Novel Patch Pump for Insulin Delivery and Comparative Accuracy Evaluation.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of beinaglutide with continuous subcutaneous infusion in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, control, open-labeled clinical trial.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Trial
- Accuracy Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Patch Pump Prototype.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new insulin patch pump for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion was developed. The pump is composed of reusable and disposable parts and operates with a stepping motor. This pump was compared to a patch pump and a durable pump regarding basal rate and bolus accuracy. Using a microgravimetric method, boluses of 0.2 U, 1 U and 7 U, and a basal rate of 1 U/h were tested. For all pumps, bolus accuracy was higher when larger volumes were delivered. While median deviations were similar for all pumps, there were differences in the precision of individual boluses and when regarding basal rate delivery divided into 1-h windows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.