ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2021
Imaging-guided nanomedicine development.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of research trends on nanotechnology applications in atherosclerosis.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Development of Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- CT-Based Attenuation Correction Algorithm for Quantitative L-Shell X-Ray Fluorescence Imaging of Gold Nanoparticles in Murine Tumor Tissues.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements and challenges of ultrasound imaging in the management of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Progress and application of intelligent nanomedicine in urinary system tumors.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2024Review
- High-Performance Hybrid Phototheranostics for NIR-IIb Fluorescence Imaging and NIR-II-Excitable Photothermal Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Exploiting recent trends for the synthesis and surface functionalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles towards biomedical applications.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2022Review
- Lanthanide porphyrinoids as molecular theranostics.Chemical Society reviews · 2022Review
- Enzyme-activated probes in optical imaging: a focus on atherosclerosis.Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanomedicine research is an active field that produces thousands of studies every year. However, translation of nanotherapeutics to the clinic has yet to catch up with such a vast output. In recent years, the need to better understand nanomedicines' in vivo behavior has been identified as one of the major challenges for efficient clinical translation. In this context, noninvasive imaging offers attractive solutions to provide valuable information about nanomedicine biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, stability, or therapeutic efficacy. Here, we review the latest imaging approaches used in the development of therapeutic nanomedicines, discuss why these strategies bring added value along the translational pipeline, and give a perspective on future advances in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.