Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735778›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

"PrEP just isn't my priority": Adherence challenges among women who inject drugs participating in a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) demonstration project in Philadelphia, PA USA.

Marisa Felsher, Eliza Ziegler, K Rivet Amico, Adam Carrico, Jennie Coleman, Alexis M Roth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marisa FelsherDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 4940 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. Electronic address: mfelshe1@jh.edu.
Eliza ZieglerDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: elizaziegler@gmail.com.
K Rivet AmicoDepartment of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Electronic address: ramico@umich.edu.
Adam CarricoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. Electronic address: a.carrico@miami.edu.
Jennie ColemanPrevention Point Philadelphia, 2913 Kensington Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19134, USA. Electronic address: jcoleman345@gmail.com.
Alexis M RothDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: amr395@drexel.edu.
Drexel University · USCenter Point · USJohns Hopkins University · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Packaging Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) to Prevent HIV Transmission among Women who Inject DrugsR21DA043417 · NIDA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI ROTH, ALEXIS MARIE · 2017 to 2018
$442k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA043417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the ability to curb HIV transmission among women if they are highly adherent (e.g. 6/7 weekly doses). In a recent PrEP demonstration project with 95 women who inject drugs (WWID) in Philadelphia, PA, USA, PrEP uptake was high but adherence was low. This qualitative study draws upon the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations (BMVP) to describe how the context of 23 WWID's lives challenged PrEP adherence using narrative data from in-depth interviews. Content analysis suggests that women's need to organize their day around predisposing survival needs made it difficult to prioritize PrEP. Adherence was further challenged by dis-enabling structural forces such as entry into institutions that do not provide PrEP (e.g., drug treatment and correctional facilities) and medication diversion to illicit marketplaces. Overtime, women's perceived need for PrEP was dynamic: in periods they characterized as risky, women considered PrEP highly beneficial and described enhanced motivation to adhere. In periods of low perceived risk, women were less committed to continuing daily PrEP in the context of their competing survival needs. In sum, WWID faced challenges to PrEP adherence that correspond to all of the BMVP domains. To optimize PrEP for WWID, multi-level programs are needed that address the determinants that both increase HIV susceptibility and undermine adherence.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPharmaceutical PreparationsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisFemaleHumansMedication AdherencePhiladelphiaVulnerable PopulationsAnti-HIV AgentsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdherenceHIVPersistencePre-exposure prophylaxisQualitativeWomen who inject drugs

Identifiers

PMID33735778
PMCPMC8009846
OpenAlexW3133958199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.