Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735777›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

Mental associations with COVID-19 and how they relate with self-reported protective behaviors: A national survey in the United States.

Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Katherine G Carman, Andrew M Parker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparing the Antimicrobial Resistance Crisis to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Public Health Messaging Experiment.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mental Models of Illness during the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Dual-Path Effect of Mortality Salience Induced by COVID-19 on Food Safety Behavior in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wändi Bruine de BruinUniversity of Southern California, USA. Electronic address: wandibdb@usc.edu.
Katherine G CarmanRAND Corporation, USA.
Andrew M ParkerRAND Corporation, USA.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Toward Next Generation Data on Health and Life Changes at Older Ages: Administrative Supplement to track the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on American familiesU01AG054580 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KAPTEYN, ARIE · 2017 to 2022
$27.3M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG054580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTo understand novel diseases, patients may draw comparisons to other diseases.

objectiveWe examined whether mentally associating specific diseases with COVID-19 was related to self-reported protective behaviors early in the pandemic.

methodsIn March 2020, a national sample of 6534 U.S. adults listed diseases that came to mind when thinking of COVID-19. They self-reported protective behaviors, demographics, and COVID-19 risk perceptions.

resultsParticipants associated COVID-19 with common infectious diseases like seasonal influenza (59%), common cold (11%), and pneumonia (10%), or emergent infectious diseases like pandemic influenza (28%), SARS/MERS (27%), and Ebola (14%). Seasonal influenza was most commonly mentioned, in all demographic groups. Participants mentioning seasonal influenza or common cold reported fewer protective behaviors. Those mentioning pneumonia or emergent infectious diseases reported more protective behaviors. Mentioning pneumonia, SARS/MERS, and Ebola was associated with the most protective behaviors, after accounting for other generated diseases, demographics, and risk perceptions (e.g., for avoiding crowds, OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.83; OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.46; OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.52, respectively).

conclusionsEarly in the pandemic, most participants mentally associated COVID-19 with seasonal flu, which may have undermined willingness to protect themselves. To motivate behavior change, COVID-19 risk communications may need to mention diseases that resonate with people while retaining accuracy.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health BehaviorInfluenza, HumanAdultAgedFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Self ReportUnited StatesAnalogiesCOVID-19 perceptionsMental models

Identifiers

PMID33735777
PMCPMC7937328
OpenAlexW3134173749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.