ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2021
Evaluation of alternative diluents for clinical use of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH-aaes).
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unlocking the Potential of Collagenases: Structures, Functions, and Emerging Therapeutic Horizons.Biodesign research · 2024Article
- CollagenaseAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCollagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH-aesthetic formulation [CCH-aaes]; QWO™ [Endo Aesthetics, Malvern PA, USA] is approved as a subcutaneous injection for treatment of cellulite. In the aesthetic practice, dilution of marketed products is commonly employed to tailor treatments to individual patients or off-label locations. Dilution beyond the 0.23 mg/ml achievable with the proprietary diluent supplied with the CCH-aaes lyophilized powder requires diluents readily available in clinic.
aimTo characterize the functionality and stability of CCH-aaes when reconstituted and/or diluted with alternative diluents, including normal saline, bacteriostatic saline, and/or proprietary diluent. PATIENTS/
methodsEach dilution was assessed for purity using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS PAGE), activity using collagenase (AUX-I) and gelatinase (AUX-II) assays, and aggregation using size-exclusion chromatography.
resultsWhen reconstituted with either saline or proprietary diluent, and diluted with proprietary diluent or saline, purity, activity, and stability of CCH-aaes is maintained for up to 24 h at 5°C or 25°C. In contrast, use of bacteriostatic saline to reconstitute and/or dilute CCH-aaes results in up to a 40% decrease in activity and aggregation of 5.3% of CCH-aaes protein. Importantly, inclusion of 2% lidocaine and 1:200 000 epinephrine does not negatively impact CCH-aaes purity, concentration, or activity for up to 24 h at 5°C or 25°C.
conclusionsFrom an efficacy and safety perspective, CCH-aaes must not be/should not be reconstituted and/or diluted with bacteriostatic saline to avoid injection of protein aggregates. Ideally, CCH-aaes should be reconstituted in proprietary diluent: further dilution with normal saline and addition of lidocaine and epinephrine is acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.