Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735479›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of neurology2021

Retinal layer thinning predicts treatment failure in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Gabriel Bsteh, Harald Hegen, Patrick Altmann, Michael Auer, Klaus Berek, Franziska Di Pauli, Fritz Leutmezer, Paulus Rommer, Sebastian Wurth, Anne Zinganell and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel BstehDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-0851
Harald HegenDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2833-6337
Patrick AltmannDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-3693
Michael AuerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Klaus BerekDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2755-2043
Franziska Di PauliDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Fritz LeutmezerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Paulus RommerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5209-6647
Sebastian WurthDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Anne ZinganellDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Tobias ZrzavyDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8909-1591
Florian DeisenhammerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas BergerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePeripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning are markers of neuroaxonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS), which is reduced by disease-modifying treatment (DMT). We aimed to investigate the potential of pRNFL and GCIPL thinning for prediction of DMT failure in relapsing MS (RMS).

methodsIn this 4-year prospective observational study on 113 RMS patients, pRNFL and GCIPL were measured at DMT initiation and after 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24). Treatment failure was defined as 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and/or Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) worsening. Optimal cutoff values for predicting treatment failure were determined by receiver operating characteristic analyses and hazard ratios (HRs) by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, EDSS/SDMT, and DMT class.

resultsThinning of GCIPL >0.5 μm/year at M24 showed superior value for treatment failure prediction (HR: 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-7.6, p < 0.001; specificity 91%, sensitivity 81%), followed by GCIPL >0.5 μm at M12 (odds ratio [OR]: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.4-6.9, p < 0.001; specificity 85%, sensitivity 78%), and pRNFL ≥2 μm/year at M24 (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5, p = 0.023; specificity 84%, sensitivity 69%), whereas pRNFL at M12 was not predictive.

conclusionsGCIPL, and to a lesser degree pRNFL, thinning predicts disability progression after DMT initiation and may be a useful and accessible biomarker of treatment failure in RMS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisHumansNerve FibersProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment Failuredisease-modifying treatmentGCIPLmultiple sclerosisOCTretinal thinning

Identifiers

PMID33735479
PMCPMC8251588
OpenAlexW3138471510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.