ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021
Myocardial stress perfusion scintigraphy for outcome prediction in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Prognostic Value of Automated Measurements in Nuclear Cardiology: Comparisons with Expert Scoring.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary angiography has been recommended in all patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. The role of ischemia testing, for example, through stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), for risk prediction is not well established.
methodsWe evaluated 1576 consecutive patients referred to MPS and stratified into 3 LV ejection fraction (LVEF) categories: ≤35%, 36-49%, and ≥ 50%.
resultsPatients with LVEF ≤35% were oldest, most often men, and with the highest likelihood of prior early (elective or urgent) coronary revascularization. They had also the highest values or summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference score (SDS), as well as the highest frequency of significant coronary artery disease, and a greater number of diseased vessels. FOLLOW-UP: In this subgroup, 32 cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (21%), 35 all-cause deaths (22%), and 37 cardiovascular deaths, non-fatal MI, or late revascularizations (27%) were recorded with the shortest survival among all LVEF classes. SRS, SSS, and SDS had very low area under the curve values for the prediction of the 3 endpoints, with very high cut-offs, respectively. SRS and SSS cut-offs predicted a worse outcome in Cox regression models including the number of diseased vessels and early revascularization.
conclusionsIn patients with LVEF ≤35%, SRS and SSS are less predictive of outcome than in patients with better preserved systolic dysfunction, but their cut-offs retain independent prognostic significance from the number of vessels with significant stenoses and from early revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.