SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2022
Analysis of mutations in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma reveals novel genes and mutations associated with patient-specific characteristics and metastasis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- CDKN2A, ITGA3, SMAD4 and SIRT7 gene expression in human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma development and pre-clinical diagnosis.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Genomic Insights into Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Article
- Duality of the SVIL expression in bladder cancer and its correlation with immune infiltration.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Next-generation sequencing in dermatology.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- CD8/PD-L1 immunohistochemical reactivity and gene alterations in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.PloS one · 2023Article
- AHNAKs roles in physiology and malignant tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Systematic Review of Tumor Profiling Studies.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022Review
- MDN1 Mutation Is Associated With High Tumor Mutation Burden and Unfavorable Prognosis in Breast Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) causes approximately 1,000,000 cases and 9000 deaths each year in the United States. While individual tumor sequencing studies have discovered driver mutations in SCC, there has yet to be a review and subsequent analysis synthesizing current studies. To conduct a comprehensive synthesis and analysis of SCC sequencing studies with individual patient-level data, a comprehensive literature search was performed. Statistical analyses were performed to identify trends. Studies meeting inclusion criteria included a total of 279 patients (189 localized SCCs, 90 metastatic SCCs). Several mutations were correlated with demographic characteristics (TP53, MLL4, BRCA2, COL4A1). TP53, TERT, SPEN, MLL3, and NOTCH2 mutations were significantly more likely to be found in metastatic versus localized SCCs even after the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Silent mutations were found more in localized SCCs than metastatic SCCs, and nonsense mutations were found more in metastatic SCCs than localized SCCs (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.04, respectively). Additional mutations were identified that have not yet been explored in SCC including AHNAK2, LRP1B, TRIO, MDN1, COL4A2, SVIL, VPS13C, DST, DMD, and DYSF. Overall, novel mutations were identified and differences between mutation patterns in localized and metastatic SCCs were found. These findings may have clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.