Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735299›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effect of population inflow and outflow between rural and urban areas on regional antimicrobial use surveillance.

Ryuji Koizumi, Yoshiki Kusama, Yuichi Muraki, Masahiro Ishikane, Daisuke Yamasaki, Masaki Tanabe, Norio Ohmagari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryuji KoizumiAMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiki KusamaAMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7072-2338
Yuichi MurakiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6951-5676
Masahiro IshikaneAMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke YamasakiDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Mie University Hospital, Mie, Japan.
Masaki TanabeDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Mie University Hospital, Mie, Japan.
Norio OhmagariAMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRegional-level measures can complement national antimicrobial stewardship programs. In Japan, sub-prefectural regions called secondary medical areas (SMAs) provide general inpatient care within their borders, and regional antimicrobial stewardship measures are frequently implemented at this level. There is therefore a need to conduct antimicrobial use (AMU) surveillance at this level to ascertain antimicrobial consumption. However, AMU estimates are generally standardized to residence-based nighttime populations, which do not account for population mobility across regional borders. We examined the impact of population in/outflow on SMA-level AMU estimates by comparing the differences between standardization using daytime and nighttime populations.

methodsWe obtained AMU information from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. AMU was quantified at the prefectural and SMA levels using the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) divided by (a) 1,000 nighttime population per day or (b) 1,000 daytime population per day. We identified and characterized the discrepancies between the two types of estimates at the prefectural and SMA levels.

resultsThe national AMU was 17.21 DDDs per 1,000 population per day. The mean (95% confidence interval) prefectural-level DDDs per 1,000 nighttime and daytime population per day were 17.27 (14.10, 20.44) and 17.41 (14.30, 20.53), respectively. The mean (95% confidence interval) SMA-level DDDs per 1,000 nighttime and daytime population per day were 16.12 (9.84, 22.41) and 16.41 (10.57, 22.26), respectively. The nighttime population-standardized estimates were generally higher than the daytime population-standardized estimates in urban areas, but lower in the adjacent suburbs. Large differences were observed in the main metropolitan hubs in eastern and western Japan.

conclusionRegional-level AMU estimates, especially of smaller regions such as SMAs, are susceptible to the use of different populations for standardization. This finding indicates that AMU standardization based on population values is not suitable for AMU estimates in small regions.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipChildDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPopulation DynamicsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33735299
PMCPMC7971456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.