Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735296›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Perceptions of the parents of deceased children and of healthcare providers about end-of-life communication and breaking bad news at a tertiary care public hospital in India: A qualitative exploratory study.

Manoja Kumar Das, Narendra Kumar Arora, Harish Kumar Chellani, Pradeep Kumar Debata, K R Meena, Reeta Rasaily, Gurkirat Kaur, Prikanksha Malik, Shipra Joshi, Manisha Kumari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parental expectations regarding the announcement of a diagnosis of a rare oral disease: a qualitative study in Marseille, France.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manoja Kumar DasThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8559-5837
Narendra Kumar AroraThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Harish Kumar ChellaniDepartment of Pediatrics, Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Pradeep Kumar DebataDepartment of Pediatrics, Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India.
K R MeenaDepartment of Pediatrics, Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Reeta RasailyDivision of Reproductive Biology Maternal and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Gurkirat KaurThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Prikanksha MalikThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Shipra JoshiThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Manisha KumariThe INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
INCLEN Trust International · INVardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital · INIndian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents of dying children face unique challenge and expect compassionate support from health care providers (HCPs). This study explored the experiences of the parents and HCPs about the end-of-life care and breaking bad news and related positive and negative factors in Indian context.

methodsThis qualitative exploratory study was conducted at paediatrics department of a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. In-depth interviews with the parents (n = 49) and family members (n = 21) of the children died at the hospital and HCPs (6 doctors, 6 nurses and 4 support staffs) were conducted. Also events and communication around death of eight children were observed. Data were inductively analysed using thematic content analysis method to identify emerging themes and codes.

resultsDoctors were the lead communicators. Majority of parents perceived the attitude, communication and language used as by resident doctors as brief, insensitive and sometimes inappropriate or negative. They perceived that the attitude and communication by senior doctor's as empathetic, positive and complete. Parents recalled the death declaration by resident doctors as non-empathetic, blunt and cold. Most parents received no emotional support from HCPs during and after death of their child. All doctors expressed that death of their patients affected them and their emotions, which they coped through different activities. The overcrowded wards, high workload, infrastructural limitation and no formal communication training added to the emotional stress of the HCPs.

conclusionsMajority of the communication by the HCPs during the hospitalisation and end-of-life period were perceived as suboptimal by the parents. The HCPs were emotionally affected and faced end-of-life communication challenges. The study highlights the communication by HCPs and support for parents during the end-of-life communication and breaking bad news. It suggests adoption of context specific communication protocol and materials and training of HCPs in communication to improve the quality of care.

Indexed as

CommunicationTruth DisclosureAdolescentAdultAttitude to DeathChildFamilyHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTerminal CareTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33735296
PMCPMC7971872
OpenAlexW3138104712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.