ArticlePloS one2021
Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Adenophora racemosa (Campanulaceae): Comparative analysis with congeneric species.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chloroplast genome characterization of Adenophora taquetii and comparative analysis with related Adenophora species.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequencing of Pseudocodon convolvulaceus, a medicinal herb from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in China.PloS one · 2025Article
- Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Rhodiola sachalinensis and comparative analysis with its congeneric plants.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Kazakhstan tulips: comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes of four local and endangered species of the genusFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- The First Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2023Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequences of six Hylotelephium species: Comparative genomic analysis and phylogenetic relationships.PloS one · 2023Article
- Chloroplast Genomes of GenusFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A comparison of 25 complete chloroplast genomes between sister mangrove speciesFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of complete chloroplast genomes from fiveFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenophora racemosa, belonging to the Campanulaceae, is an important species because it is endemic to Korea. The goal of this study was to assemble and annotate the chloroplast genome of A. racemosa and compare it with published chloroplast genomes of congeneric species. The chloroplast genome was reconstructed using de novo assembly of paired-end reads generated by the Illumina MiSeq platform. The chloroplast genome size of A. racemosa was 169,344 bp. In total, 112 unique genes (78 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNAs, and 4 rRNAs) were identified. A Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on 76 protein-coding genes divided the five Adenophora species into two clades, showing that A. racemosa is more closely related to Adenophora stricta than to Adenophora divaricata. The gene order and contents of the LSC region of A. racemosa were identical to those of A. divaricata and A. stricta, but the structure of the SSC and IRs was unique due to IR contraction. Nucleotide diversity (Pi) >0.05 was found in eleven regions among the three Adenophora species not included in sect. Remotiflorae and in six regions between two species (A. racemosa and A. stricta).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.