Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735249›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Unsupervised cluster analysis of patients with recovered left ventricular ejection fraction identifies unique clinical phenotypes.

Andrew Perry, Francis Loh, Luigi Adamo, Kathleen W Zhang, Elena Deych, Randi Foraker, Douglas L Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew PerryCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3342-6158
Francis LohInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Luigi AdamoCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Kathleen W ZhangCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Elena DeychCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Randi ForakerInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Douglas L MannCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with heart failure (HF) with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) are a recently identified cohort that are phenotypically and biologically different from HFrEF and HFpEF patients. Whether there are unique phenotypes among HFrecEF patients is not known.

methodsWe studied all patients at a large medical center, who had an improvement in LVEF from ≤ 35% to ≥ 50% (LVrecEF) between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2013. We identified a set of 11 clinical variables and then performed unsupervised clustering analyses to identify unique clinical phenotypes among patients with LVrecEF, followed by a Kaplan-Meier analysis to identify differences in survival and the proportion of LVrecEF patients who maintained an LVEF ≥ 50% during the study period.

resultsWe identified 889 patients with LVrecEF who clustered into 7 unique phenotypes ranging in size from 37 to 420 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in mortality across clusters (logrank p<0.0001), with survival ranging from 14% to 87% at 1000 days, as well as significant differences in the proportion of LVrecEF patients who maintained an LVEF ≥ 50%.

conclusionThere is significant clinical heterogeneity among patients with LVrecEF. Clinical outcomes are distinct across phenotype clusters as defined by clinical cardiac characteristics and co-morbidities. Clustering algorithms may identify patients who are at high risk for recurrent HF, and thus be useful for guiding treatment strategies for patients with LVrecEF.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisFemaleHeart FailureHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID33735249
PMCPMC7971566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.