Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735243›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Epidemiology of brucellosis in cattle and dairy farmers of rural Ludhiana, Punjab.

Hannah R Holt, Jasbir Singh Bedi, Paviter Kaur, Punam Mangtani, Narinder Singh Sharma, Jatinder Paul Singh Gill, Yogeshwar Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Manmeet Kaur, John McGiven and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of immune responses toFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Seroprevalence of Brucella Infection and Its Determinants Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Burao City: At the Human Livestock Interface in Northeast Somaliland, Somalia.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploring bovine brucellosis in Bangladesh: Current scenario and future outlook.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A scoping review on the epidemiology and public significance ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modelling the control of bovine brucellosis in India.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Serological and molecular prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah R HoltVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0892-0034
Jasbir Singh BediSchool of Public Health and Zoonosis, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Paviter KaurDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Punam MangtaniFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Narinder Singh SharmaDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Jatinder Paul Singh GillSchool of Public Health and Zoonosis, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Yogeshwar SinghDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Rajesh KumarSchool of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9750-3437
Manmeet KaurSchool of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
John McGivenOIE Brucellosis Reference Laboratory, FAO Collaborating Centre for Brucellosis, Department of Bacteriology, Animal & Plant Health Agency, Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-1324
Javier GuitianVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0799-0476
Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INRoyal Veterinary College · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L004836/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L004895/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease imposing significant impacts on livestock production and public health worldwide. India is the world's leading milk producer and Punjab is the state which produces the most cattle and buffalo milk per capita. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of bovine brucellosis to provide evidence for control of the disease in Punjab State, India. A cross-sectional study of dairy farms was conducted in humans and livestock in rural Ludhiana district using a multi-stage sampling strategy. The study suggests that brucellosis is endemic at high levels in cattle and buffalo in the study area with 15.1% of large ruminants testing seropositive and approximately a third of dairy farms having at least one animal test seropositive. In total, 9.7% of those in direct contact with livestock tested seropositive for Brucella spp. Persons that assisted with calving and/or abortion within the last year on a farm with seronegative livestock and people which did not assist with calving/abortion had 0.35 (95% CI: 0.17 to 7.1) and 0.21 (0.09 to 0.46) times the odds of testing seropositive compared to persons assisting with calving/abortion in a seropositive farm, respectively. The study demonstrated that persons in direct contact with cattle and buffalo in the study area have high risk of exposure to Brucella spp. Control of the disease in livestock is likely to result in benefits to both animal and public health sectors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial LoadBrucellaBrucellosisBuffaloesCattleCattle DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDairyingFarmersHumansIndiaLivestockRural PopulationSeroconversionSeroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID33735243
PMCPMC8034737
OpenAlexW3136317259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.