Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735222›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Integrating human services and criminal justice data with claims data to predict risk of opioid overdose among Medicaid beneficiaries: A machine-learning approach.

Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, Julie M Donohue, Eric G Hulsey, Susan Barnes, Yuan Li, Courtney C Kuza, Qingnan Yang, Jeanine Buchanich, James L Huang, Christina Mair and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06806163 (Machine-Learning Prediction and Reducing Overdoses With EHR Nudges), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06806163 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Machine-Learning Prediction and Reducing Overdoses With EHR Nudges

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,350ConditionsOpioid Overdose, Opioid Use, Opioid Use Disorder, OpioidsArmsEHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag, EHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag with Behavioral Nudges, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Hsuan Lo-CiganicDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6590-4770
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Eric G HulseyVital Strategies, Overdose Prevention Program, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Susan BarnesDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Yuan LiAllegheny County Department of Human Services, Office of Analytics, Technology and Planning, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Courtney C KuzaCenter for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Qingnan YangCenter for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Jeanine BuchanichDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
James L HuangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Christina MairDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Debbie L WilsonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Walid F GelladCenter for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · USAllegheny County · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Using Machine Learning to Predict Problematic Prescription Opioid Use and Opioid OverdoseR01DA044985 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Walid F. Gellad · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health system data incompletely capture the social risk factors for drug overdose. This study aimed to improve the accuracy of a machine-learning algorithm to predict opioid overdose risk by integrating human services and criminal justice data with health claims data to capture the social determinants of overdose risk. This prognostic study included Medicaid beneficiaries (n = 237,259) in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania enrolled between 2015 and 2018, randomly divided into training, testing, and validation samples. We measured 290 potential predictors (239 derived from Medicaid claims data) in 30-day periods, beginning with the first observed Medicaid enrollment date during the study period. Using a gradient boosting machine, we predicted a composite outcome (i.e., fatal or nonfatal opioid overdose constructed using medical examiner and claims data) in the subsequent month. We compared prediction performance between a Medicaid claims only model to one integrating human services and criminal justice data with Medicaid claims (i.e., integrated model) using several metrics (e.g., C-statistic, number needed to evaluate [NNE] to identify one overdose). Beneficiaries were stratified into risk-score decile subgroups. The samples (training = 79,087, testing = 79,086, validation = 79,086) had similar characteristics (age = 38±18 years, female = 56%, white = 48%, having at least one overdose = 1.7% during study period). Using the validation sample, the integrated model slightly improved on the Medicaid claims only model (C-statistic = 0.885; 95%CI = 0.877-0.892 vs. C-statistic = 0.871; 95%CI = 0.863-0.878), with small corresponding improvements in the NNE and positive predictive value. Nine of the top 30 most important predictors in the integrated model were human services and criminal justice variables. Using the integrated model, approximately 70% of individuals with overdoses were members of the top risk decile (overdose rates in the subsequent month = 47/10,000 beneficiaries). Few individuals in the bottom 9 deciles had overdose episodes (0-12/10,000). Machine-learning algorithms integrating claims and social service and criminal justice data modestly improved opioid overdose prediction among Medicaid beneficiaries for a large U.S. county heavily affected by the opioid crisis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidChildCriminal LawFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedOpiate OverdosePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID33735222
PMCPMC7971495
OpenAlexW3139034436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.