ArticlePloS one2021
Building a semantically annotated corpus for chronic disease complications using two document types.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Narrative information in electronic health records (EHRs) contains a wealth of information related to patient health conditions. In addition, people use Twitter to express their experiences regarding personal health issues, such as medical complaints, symptoms, treatments, lifestyle, and other factors. Both genres of text include different types of health-related information concerning disease complications and risk factors. Knowing detailed information about controlling disease risk factors has a great impact on modifying these risks and subsequently preventing disease complications. Text-mining tools provide efficient solutions to extract and integrate vital information related to disease complications hidden in the large volume of the narrative text. However, the development of text-mining tools depends on the availability of an annotated corpus. In response, we have developed the PrevComp corpus, which is annotated with information relevant to the identification of disease complications, underlying risk factors, and prevention measures, in the context of the interaction between hypertension and diabetes. The corpus is unique and novel in terms of the very specific topic in the biomedical domain and as an integration of information from both EHRs and tweets collected from Twitter. The annotation scheme was designed with guidance by a domain expert, and two further domain experts performed the annotation, resulting in a high-quality annotation, with agreement rate F-scores as high as 0.60 and 0.75 for EHRs and tweets, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.