Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735173›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Predicting microbial growth dynamics in response to nutrient availability.

Olga A Nev, Richard J Lindsay, Alys Jepson, Lisa Butt, Robert E Beardmore, Ivana Gudelj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Linking Cell Size, VEnvironmental microbiology reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A comparative assesment of biostimulants in microbiome-based ecorestoration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon polluted soil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olga A NevBiosciences and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0055-2211
Richard J LindsayBiosciences and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-9285
Alys JepsonBiosciences and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7274-723X
Lisa ButtBiosciences and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4569-2691
Robert E BeardmoreBiosciences and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1770-1009
Ivana GudeljBiosciences and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-6854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing mathematical models to accurately predict microbial growth dynamics remains a key challenge in ecology, evolution, biotechnology, and public health. To reproduce and grow, microbes need to take up essential nutrients from the environment, and mathematical models classically assume that the nutrient uptake rate is a saturating function of the nutrient concentration. In nature, microbes experience different levels of nutrient availability at all environmental scales, yet parameters shaping the nutrient uptake function are commonly estimated for a single initial nutrient concentration. This hampers the models from accurately capturing microbial dynamics when the environmental conditions change. To address this problem, we conduct growth experiments for a range of micro-organisms, including human fungal pathogens, baker's yeast, and common coliform bacteria, and uncover the following patterns. We observed that the maximal nutrient uptake rate and biomass yield were both decreasing functions of initial nutrient concentration. While a functional form for the relationship between biomass yield and initial nutrient concentration has been previously derived from first metabolic principles, here we also derive the form of the relationship between maximal nutrient uptake rate and initial nutrient concentration. Incorporating these two functions into a model of microbial growth allows for variable growth parameters and enables us to substantially improve predictions for microbial dynamics in a range of initial nutrient concentrations, compared to keeping growth parameters fixed.

Indexed as

CandidaEnterobacteriaceaeModels, BiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiotechnologyCell ProliferationComputational BiologyEcology

Identifiers

PMID33735173
PMCPMC8009381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.