Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735171›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Optimal timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control.

Francesco Di Lauro, István Z Kiss, Joel C Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Confinement tonicity on epidemic spreading.Journal of mathematical biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Evidence ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Minimizing the epidemic final size while containing the infected peak prevalence in SIR systems.Automatica : the journal of IFAC, the International Federation of Automatic Control · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimizing time-limited non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19 outbreak control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco Di LauroDepartment of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton United Kingdom.
István Z KissDepartment of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1473-6644
Joel C MillerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4426-0405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interventions and outcomes in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic are highly varied. The disease and the interventions both impose costs and harm on society. Some interventions with particularly high costs may only be implemented briefly. The design of optimal policy requires consideration of many intervention scenarios. In this paper we investigate the optimal timing of interventions that are not sustainable for a long period. Specifically, we look at at the impact of a single short-term non-repeated intervention (a "one-shot intervention") on an epidemic and consider the impact of the intervention's timing. To minimize the total number infected, the intervention should start close to the peak so that there is minimal rebound once the intervention is stopped. To minimise the peak prevalence, it should start earlier, leading to initial reduction and then having a rebound to the same prevalence as the pre-intervention peak rather than one very large peak. To delay infections as much as possible (as might be appropriate if we expect improved interventions or treatments to be developed), earlier interventions have clear benefit. In populations with distinct subgroups, synchronized interventions are less effective than targeting the interventions in each subcommunity separately.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2Basic Reproduction NumberComputational BiologyCOVID-19Disease SusceptibilityHealth PolicyHumansImmunity, HerdMathematical ConceptsModels, StatisticalPandemicsPrevalenceTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33735171
PMCPMC8009413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.