Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33734801›Full record

ArticleThe American psychologist

Implications of adverse childhood experiences screening on behavioral health services: A scoping review and systems modeling analysis.

Miya L Barnett, R Christopher Sheldrick, Sabrina R Liu, Maryam Kia-Keating, Sonya Negriff

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The American psychologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Provider and Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Screening for Research on Early Life Adversity.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025
    Article
  5. Research Review: Assessment of early-life adversity and trauma - cumulative risk and dimensional approaches.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Future Directions in Lay Health Worker Involvement in Children's Mental Health Services in the U.S.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miya L BarnettDepartment of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-9998
R Christopher SheldrickHealth Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health.ORCID 0000-0003-0534-856X
Sabrina R LiuDepartment of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-5876
Maryam Kia-KeatingDepartment of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara.ORCID 0000-0002-0817-4473
Sonya NegriffDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California.ORCID 0000-0002-1660-6301
University of California, Santa Barbara · USBoston University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Lay Health Worker Mobilization to Address Disparities in Parent Training ServicesK01MH110608 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BARNETT, MIYA · 2017 to 2020
$600k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH110608NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread implementation of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screening is occurring in the United States in response to policies and practice recommendations. However, limited research has established how these screening efforts impact the health care system and ultimately health outcomes. This article examines the current knowledge base on screening in medical settings. A scoping review of articles reporting on ACEs screening and prevalence in the United States was conducted. Of the 1,643 unique studies across two decades, 12 articles meeting criteria included nine on routine screening in medical settings and three on population-based surveys. A Monte Carlo simulation model was designed to synthesize evidence, identify key areas of uncertainty, and explore service system implications. Results indicated significant heterogeneity in the proportion of respondents who reported ACEs, with 6% to 64% of patients reporting 1+ ACEs and .01% to 40.7% reporting 4+ ACEs. Gaps in the literature were identified regarding cut-scores for referrals and referral completion rates. Three scenarios, modeled based on these data and past research on behavioral health screenings in pediatric primary care, demonstrated how ACEs screening may differentially impact behavioral health care systems. Priorities for future research were highlighted to refine estimates of the likely impact of ACEs screening on health care delivery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesMental Health ServicesChildHumansPrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33734801
PMCPMC8161946
OpenAlexW3136452239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.