ArticleCancer medicine2021
Disparate outcomes in nonsmall cell lung cancer by immigration status.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nationwide analysis of disparities in guideline-concordant care in American Indians and Alaska Natives with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Hypothesized Explanations for the Observed Lung Cancer Survival Benefit Among Hispanics/Latinos in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) outcomes by race, stratified by country of origin in patients diagnosed with NSCLC in California.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2012. Race/ethnicity was defined as White (W), Black (B), Hispanic (H), and Asian (A) and stratified by country of origin (US vs. non-US [NUS]) creating the following patient cohorts: W-US, W-NUS, B-US, B-NUS, H-US, H-NUS, A-US, and A-NUS. Three multivariate models were created: model 1 adjusted for age, gender, stage, year of diagnosis and histology; model 2 included model 1 plus treatment modalities; and model 3 included model 2 with the addition of socioeconomic status, marital status, and insurance.
resultsA total of 68,232 patients were included. Median OS from highest to lowest were: A-NUS (15 months), W-NUS (14 months), A-US (13 months), B-NUS (13 months), H-US (11 months), W-US (11 months), H-NUS (10 months), and B-US (10 months) (p < 0.001). In model 1, B-US had worse OS, whereas A-US, W-NUS, B-NUS, H-NUS, and A-NUS had better OS when compared to W-US. In model 2 after adjusting for receipt of treatment, there was no difference in OS for B-US when compared to W-US. After adjusting for all variables (model 3), all race/ethnicity profiles had better OS when compared to W-US; B-NUS patients had similar OS to W-US.
conclusionForeign-born patients with NSCLC have decreased risk of mortality when compared to native-born patients in California after accounting for treatments received and socioeconomic differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.