Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33734490›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2021

A novel prognosis prediction model, including cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, ischemia-modified albumin, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and homocysteine, for ischemic stroke in the Chinese hypertensive population.

Jin Ma, Likui Shen, Lei Bao, Hua Yuan, Yingxin Wang, Hua Liu, Qiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jin MaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, P.R. China.
Likui ShenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, P.R. China.
Lei BaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, P.R. China.
Hua YuanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, P.R. China.
Yingxin WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, P.R. China.
Hua LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, P.R. China.
Qiang WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-3192

Funding

Kunshan Science Project KS18033National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is still a lack of tools to assess the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients induced by hypertension. In this study, we built a novel prognostic assessment model for ischemic stroke in the Chinese hypertensive population.

methodsMass spectrometry technique was used to analyze the changes in serum protein profiles of hypertensive patients with ischemic stroke. A total of 314 hypertensive patients were divided into the testing group (206 patients) and the validation group (108 patients).

resultsCompared with hypertensive patients without ischemic stroke, serum cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and homocysteine (HCY) levels were significantly increased among hypertensive patients with ischemic stroke (p < 0.05). Then, we built a novel prognostic assessment model for hypertensive patients with ischemic stroke [Logit(P) = 29.172-1.088*CTLA-4-0.952*IMA-0.537*Lp-PLA2 -0.066*GFAP -0.149*HCY]. It showed higher efficiency (AUC = 0.981, sensitivity = 95.5%, specificity = 93.8%) than any single marker. The estimated probability was 0.739, which means if higher than 0.739, it was classified into poor prognosis. Compared with the estimated probability ≤0.739 group, the survival rate of hypertensive patients with ischemic stroke in the estimated probability >0.739 group was significantly decreased (χ

conclusionCurrent novel prognostic assessment model we have built is of great value in the prognostic evaluation for ischemic stroke in the Chinese hypertensive population.

Indexed as

Asian People1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseBiomarkersChinaCTLA-4 AntigenFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHomocysteineHumansHypertensionIschemic StrokeLogistic ModelsMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedModels, Biological1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseBiomarkersCTLA-4 AntigenGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHomocysteineischemia-modified albuminSerum Albumin, Humanhypertensioninflammationischemic strokemass spectrometryprognosis

Identifiers

PMID33734490
PMCPMC8128308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.