Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33734416›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Evaluation of State Cannabis Laws and Rates of Self-harm and Assault.

Ellicott C Matthay, Mathew V Kiang, Holly Elser, Laura Schmidt, Keith Humphreys

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Error in End Matter.JAMA network open · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellicott C MatthayCenter for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco.
Mathew V KiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Holly ElserMedical student, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Laura SchmidtPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Keith HumphreysCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Linking local variation in marijuana and opioid policies to health outcomesR21DA046051 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI APOLLONIO, DOROTHY ELINOR, RAMO, DANIELLE E · 2019 to 2020
$442k
Reducing racial disparities in the treatment of opioid use disorder using machine learning-based causal analysisK99DA051534 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIANG, MATHEW VINHHOA · 2020 to 2021
$359k
Joint impacts of local alcohol and cannabis policies and outlet densities on violenceK99AA028256 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MATTHAY, ELLICOTT COLSON · 2020 to 2021
$342k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001872NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA028256NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA051534NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA046051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: State cannabis laws are changing rapidly. Research is inconclusive about their association with rates of self-harm and assault. Existing studies have not considered variations in cannabis commercialization across states over time. Objective: To evaluate the association of state medical and recreational cannabis laws with self-harm and assault, overall and by age and sex, while considering varying degrees of commercialization. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using a cohort design with panel fixed-effects analysis, within-state changes in claims for self-harm and assault injuries before and after changes in cannabis laws were quantified in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Comprehensive claims data on commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan beneficiaries from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2017, grouped by state and month, were evaluated. Data analysis was conducted from January 31, 2020, to January 21, 2021. Exposures: Categorical variable that indexed the degree of cannabis legalization in each state and month based on law type (medical or recreational) and operational status of dispensaries (commercialization). Main Outcomes and Measures: Claims for self-harm and assault injuries based on International Classification of Diseases codes. Results: The analysis included 75 395 344 beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 47 [22] years; 50% female; and median follow-up, 17 months [interquartile range, 8-36 months]). During the study period, 29 states permitted use of medical cannabis and 11 permitted recreational cannabis. Point estimates for populationwide rates of self-harm and assault injuries were higher in states legalizing recreational cannabis compared with states with no cannabis laws, but these results were not statistically significant (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] assault, recreational dispensaries: 1.27; 95% CI, 0.79-2.03;self-harm, recreational dispensaries aRR: 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89-1.50). Results varied by age and sex with no associations found except for states with recreational policies and self-harm among males younger than 40 years (aRR <21 years, recreational without dispensaries: 1.70; 95% CI, 1.11-2.61; aRR aged 21-39 years, recreational dispensaries: 1.46; 95% CI, 1.01-2.12). Medical cannabis was generally not associated with self-harm or assault injuries populationwide or among age and sex subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: Recreational cannabis legalization appears to be associated with relative increases in rates of claims for self-harm among male health plan beneficiaries younger than 40 years. There was no association between cannabis legalization and self-harm or assault, for any other age and sex group or for medical cannabis. States that legalize but still constrain commercialization may be better positioned to protect younger male populations from unintended harms.

Indexed as

CannabisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLegislation, DrugMaleMarijuana UseMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSelf-Injurious BehaviorUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33734416
PMCPMC7974641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.