ArticleJAMA network open2021
Comparison of Cancer Prevalence in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 at an Academic Cancer Center vs in the General Population From 1985 to 2020.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications and visual outcomes following surgical resection of pediatric optic pathway/hypothalamic gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Pooled it
- Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Precision therapeutic strategies for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Prevalence, treatment and survival of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in the Danish neurofibromatosis type 1 population.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Translating Molecular Discovery into Clinical Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in neurofibromatosis type I: diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Development of an adult neurofibromatosis clinic in the comprehensive cancer center setting and descriptive analysis of the first 100 patients with neurofibromatosis type 1.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Pleomorphic Carcinoma With EGFR and Concomitant Mutations Transformed From Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- The importance of cancer prevention policies to inform and guide preventative and screening measures for people with intellectual disabilities: The COST project "Cancer- Understanding Prevention in Intellectual Disabilities".Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID · 2026Article
- Neurofibromatosis type I -related severe aplastic anemia: an unusual association with a complicated bone marrow transplantation course.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Neoplasm risk in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 - a Danish nationwide cohort study with long-term follow-up.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Neurogenetic tumor syndromes: The current landscape of workup and treatment.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Review
- Pediatric high-grade gliomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1-A collaborative cohort study from the SIOPE HGG/DIPG working group.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- Dermoscopy-Guided High-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging of Subcentimeter Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Neurofibromas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer in neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report with literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Resection of Incidentally Detected Early-Stage Synchronous Duodenal and Jejunal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Case Report: Primary sciatic leiomyosarcoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and the Search for Effective Tumor Therapies Using High-Throughput Drug Screening.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a complex genetic disorder that is associated with not only neurofibromas, but also an increased susceptibility to other neoplasms. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of neoplasia and outcomes among patients with NF1. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted among patients with NF1 at a single academic cancer center from 1985 to 2020 with median (range) follow-up of 2.9 years (36 days to 30.5 years). Of 2427 patients evaluated for NF1, 1607 patients who met the National Institutes of Health consensus criteria for NF1 were included. This group was compared with estimates from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review 1975 to 2015 and SEER participants database unless otherwise specified. Data were analyzed from August 2018 to March 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Disease-specific survival (DSS) was measured from diagnosis date to date of neoplasm-specific death or censorship and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Deaths from disease were considered a DSS end point; other deaths were considered censored observations. Secondary outcome measures were comparisons of (1) overall survival of patients with NF1 with neurofibroma neoplasms vs those without nonneurofibroma neoplasms, (2) neoplasm prevalence in the NF1 group vs general population estimates, and (3) age at diagnosis in the NF1 group vs general population estimates for the most common neoplasms in the NF1 group. Results: Among 1607 patients with NF1, the median (range) age at initial visit was 19 years (1 month to 83 years) and 840 (52.3%) were female patients. Among 666 patients who developed other neoplasms in addition to neurofibromas (41.4%), 295 patients (18.4%) developed glioma and 243 patients (15.1%) developed malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), the most common neoplasms. Patients with NF1, compared with the general population, developed several neoplasms at a younger mean (SD) age (low-grade glioma: 12.98 [11.09] years vs 37.76 [24.53] years; P < .0001; high-grade glioma [HGG]: 27.31 [15.59] years vs 58.42 [19.09] years; P < .0001; MPNST: 33.88 [14.80] years vs 47.06 [20.76] years; P < .0001; breast cancer: 46.61 [9.94] years vs 61.71 [13.85] years; P < .0001). Patients with NF1 developed neoplasms more frequently compared with the general population (odds ratio, 9.5; 95% CI, 8.5-10.5; P < .0001). Among patients with NF1, significantly lower 5-year DSS rates were found among those with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (1 of 5 patients [20.0%]), HGG (8 of 34 patients [23.1%]), MPNST (72 of 228 patients [31.6%]), ovarian carcinoma (4 of 7 patients [57.1%]), and melanoma (8 of 12 patients [66.7%]) compared with those who had neoplasms classified as other (110 of 119 patients [92.4%]) (all P < .001) . Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that among patients with NF1, those who developed undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, HGG, MPNST, ovarian carcinoma, or melanoma had significantly lower DSS rates compared with those who developed other neoplasms. This study also found that patients with NF1 developed some neoplasms more frequently and at a younger age compared with individuals without NF1. HGGs and MPNST were noteworthy causes of death among patients NF1. This information may be useful for NF1 patient counseling and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.