Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33734093›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Implementation of the Living Well During Pregnancy Telecoaching Program for Women at High Risk of Excessive Gestational Weight Gain: Protocol for an Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Study.

Susan de Jersey, Nina Meloncelli, Taylor Guthrie, Hilary Powlesland, Leonie Callaway, Angela T Chang, Shelley Wilkinson, Tracy Comans, Elizabeth Eakin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susan de JerseyCentre for Clinical Research and Perinatal Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-8558
Nina MeloncelliCentre for Clinical Research and Perinatal Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8990-9709
Taylor GuthrieDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-0566
Hilary PowleslandDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-9907
Leonie CallawayDepartment of Obstetric Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0137-9935
Angela T ChangCentre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3036-5540
Shelley WilkinsonSchool of Human Movements and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-3473
Tracy ComansCentre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2840-3496
Elizabeth EakinSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8835-9995

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite comprehensive guidelines for healthy gestational weight gain (GWG) and evidence for the efficacy of dietary counseling coupled with weight monitoring on reducing excessive GWG, reporting on the effectiveness of interventions translated into routine antenatal care is limited.

objectiveThis study aims to implement and evaluate the Living Well during Pregnancy (LWdP) program in a large Australian antenatal care setting. Specifically, the LWdP program will be incorporated into usual care and delivered to a population of pregnant women at risk of excessive GWG through a dietitian-delivered telephone coaching service.

methodsMetrics from the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework will guide the evaluation in this hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. All women aged ≥16 years without pre-exiting diabetes with a prepregnancy BMI >25 kg/m

resultsData collection of all variables was completed in December 2020, with results expected to be published by the end of 2021.

conclusionsThis study will evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based intervention into routine health service delivery and will provide the practice-based evidence needed to inform decisions about its incorporation into routine antenatal care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/27196.

Indexed as

implementation studylifestyle interventionnutritionphysical activitypregnancyweight

Identifiers

PMID33734093
PMCPMC8086782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.