ArticleCognitive neuroscience
Sex differences in functional network dynamics observed using coactivation pattern analysis.
Article in Cognitive neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Brain Network Dynamics in Schizophrenia Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Resting-State fMRI Study Using Co-Activation Pattern Analysis.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Neural flexibility in metabolic demand dynamics reveals sex-specific differences and supports cognition in late childhood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Common and unique network basis for externally and internally driven flexibility in cognition: From a developmental perspective.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Sex-specific differences in brain activity dynamics of youth with a family history of substance use disorder.Nature. Mental health · 2025Article
- Unresponsiveness induced by sevoflurane and propofol is associated with reduced basal forebrain cholinergic nuclei functional connectivity in humans,Neuroimage. Reports · 2024Article
- Connectivity in the Dorsal Visual Stream Is Enhanced in Action Video Game Players.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Human brain state dynamics are highly reproducible and associated with neural and behavioral features.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Human brain state dynamics reflect individual neuro-phenotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Explainable Multimodal Graph Isomorphism Network for Interpreting Sex Differences in Adolescent Neurodevelopment.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Wearing a KN95/FFP2 facemask has no measureable effect on functional activity in a challenging working memory n-back task.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Transcranial direct current stimulation and neuronal functional connectivity in MCI: role of individual factors associated to AD.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Sex differences in the effects of trait anxiety and age on resting-state functional connectivities of the amygdala.Journal of affective disorders reports · 2023Article
- Estimating dynamic individual coactivation patterns based on densely sampled resting-state fMRI data and utilizing it for better subject identification.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
- Impact of sex and serum lipids interaction on working memory: A large-scale brain networks study.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Article
- Wearing a KN95/FFP2 facemask induces subtle yet significant brain functional connectivity modifications restricted to the salience network.European radiology experimental · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differences in the organization of large-scale resting-state brain networks have been identified using traditional static measures, which average functional connectivity over extended time periods. In contrast, emerging dynamic measures have the potential to define sex differences in network changes over time, providing additional understanding of neurobiological sex differences. To meet this goal, we used a Coactivation Pattern Analysis (CAP) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 181 males and 181 females from the Human Connectome Project. Significant main effects of sex were observed across two independent imaging sessions. Relative to males, females spent more total time in two transient network states (TNSs) spatially overlapping with the dorsal attention network and occipital/sensory-motor network. Greater time spent in these TNSs was related to females making more frequent transitions into these TNSs compared to males. In contrast, males spent more total time in TNSs spatially overlapping with the salience network, which was related to males staying for longer periods once entering these TNSs compared to females. State-to-state transitions also significantly differed between sexes: females transitioned more frequently from default mode network (DMN) states to the dorsal attention network state, whereas males transitioned more frequently from DMN states to salience network states. Results show that males and females spend differing amounts of time at rest in two distinct attention-related networks and show sex-specific transition patterns from DMN states into these attention-related networks. This work lays the groundwork for future investigations into the cognitive and behavioral implications of these sex-specific network dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.