Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33733974›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2021

Impact of fibrin glue versus suture closure on double-headed pterygia in Asian eyes - a 7-year study in a tertiary institution.

Wei Wei Dayna Yong, Liang Shen, Ray Manotosh, Wee Tien Anna Marie Tan, Hui Chen Charmaine Chai

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Wei Dayna YongDepartment of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Liang ShenYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ray ManotoshDepartment of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Wee Tien Anna Marie TanDepartment of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Hui Chen Charmaine ChaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
National University Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the recurrence rate and outcomes of double-headed pterygia using fibrin glue versus suture closure of conjunctival autograft.

methodsAll patients with double-headed pterygia who underwent pterygia excision with conjunctival autograft from January 2012 to January 2019 in the National University Hospital of Singapore were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether fibrin glue or sutures were used to secure the conjunctival autograft in place. All patients had a minimum of 6 months follow-up.

resultsA total (26 patients) of 22 eyes had fibrin glue, while eight eyes underwent suture closure of their conjunctival autograft. Fibrin glue group had 4.5% recurrence rate, while suture group had 37.5% recurrence rate (

conclusionsLow recurrence rates and good postoperative visual outcomes can be achieved with the split conjunctival autograft technique. Our study suggests that fibrin glue has an additional benefit over the use of sutures in the management of these complex cases.

Indexed as

SuturesSuture TechniquesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConjunctivaFemaleFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHumansMaleMiddle AgedPterygiumTissue AdhesivesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeFibrin Tissue AdhesiveTissue Adhesivesconjunctival autograftDouble-headed pterygiafibrin gluesutures

Identifiers

PMID33733974
PMCPMC7993389
OpenAlexW3137797256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.