Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33733812›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

Repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient and fat fraction measurement of focal myeloma lesions on whole body magnetic resonance imaging.

Tara Barwick, Matthew Orton, Dow Mu Koh, Martin Kaiser, Andrea Rockall, Nina Tunariu, Matthew Blackledge, Christina Messiou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value ofClinical and experimental medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tara BarwickImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Matthew OrtonThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Dow Mu KohThe Royal Marsden Hospital Foundation NHS Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Martin Kaiser
Andrea RockallImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Nina TunariuThe Royal Marsden Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, London, UK.
Matthew BlackledgeThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Christina MessiouThe Royal Marsden Hospital Foundation NHS Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess intra- and inter-reader variability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fat fraction (FF) measurement in focal myeloma bone lesions and the influence of lesion size.

methods22 myeloma patients with focal active disease on whole body MRI were included. Two readers outlined a small (5-10 mm) and large lesion (>10 mm) in each subject on derived ADC and FF maps; one reader performed this twice. Intra- and inter-reader agreement for small and large lesion groups were calculated for derived statistics from each map using within-subject standard deviation, coefficient of variation, interclass correlation coefficient measures, and visualized with Bland-Altman plots.

resultsFor mean ADC, intra- and inter-reader repeatability demonstrated equivalently low coefficient of variation (3.0-3.6%) and excellent interclass correlation coefficient (0.975-0.982) for both small and large lesions. For mean FF, intra- and inter-reader repeatability was significantly poorer for small lesions compared to large lesions (intra-reader within-subject standard variation estimate is 2.7 times higher for small lesions than large lesions (

conclusionThere is excellent intra- and inter-reader agreement for mean ADC estimates, even for lesions as small as 5 mm. For FF measurements, there is a significant increase in coefficient of variation for smaller lesions, suggesting lesions >10 mm should be selected for lesion FF measurement. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: ADC measurements of focal myeloma have excellent intra- and inter-reader agreement. FF measurements are more susceptible to lesion size as intra- and inter-reader agreement is significantly impaired in lesions less than 10 mm.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaObserver VariationPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsWhole Body Imaging

Identifiers

PMID33733812
PMCPMC8010556
OpenAlexW3136332733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.