Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33733706›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2021

Differing Time Courses of Reward-Related Attentional Processing: An EEG Source-Space Analysis.

Denise E L Lockhofen, Nils Hübner, Fatma Hemdan, Gebhard Sammer, Dion Henare, Anna Schubö, Christoph Mulert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denise E L LockhofenCentre for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstraße 36, 35385, Giessen, Hessen, Germany. Denise.E.Lockhofen@psychiat.med.uni-giessen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5063-3426
Nils HübnerCentre for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstraße 36, 35385, Giessen, Hessen, Germany.
Fatma HemdanCentre for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstraße 36, 35385, Giessen, Hessen, Germany.
Gebhard SammerCentre for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstraße 36, 35385, Giessen, Hessen, Germany.
Dion HenareCognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Anna SchuböCognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Christoph MulertCentre for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstraße 36, 35385, Giessen, Hessen, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since our environment typically contains more information than can be processed at any one time due to the limited capacity of our visual system, we are bound to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information. This process, termed attentional selection, is usually categorized into bottom-up and top-down processes. However, recent research suggests reward might also be an important factor in guiding attention. Monetary reward can bias attentional selection in favor of task-relevant targets and reduce the efficiency of visual search when a reward-associated, but task-irrelevant distractor is present. This study is the first to investigate reward-related target and distractor processing in an additional singleton task using neurophysiological measures and source space analysis. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that source space analysis would find enhanced neural activity in regions of the value-based attention network, such as the visual cortex and the anterior cingulate. Additionally, we went further and explored the time courses of the underlying attentional mechanisms. Our neurophysiological results showed that rewarding distractors led to a stronger attentional capture. In line with this, we found that reward-associated distractors (compared with reward-associated targets) enhanced activation in frontal regions, indicating the involvement of top-down control processes. As hypothesized, source space analysis demonstrated that reward-related targets and reward-related distractors elicited activation in regions of the value-based attention network. However, these activations showed time-dependent differences, indicating that the neural mechanisms underlying reward biasing might be different for task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimuli.

Indexed as

RewardVisual CortexElectroencephalographyFrontal LobeHumansReaction TimeAttentional selectionBottom-up attentionEEGRewardSource space analysisTop-down attention

Identifiers

PMID33733706
PMCPMC8099853
OpenAlexW3138159255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.