ArticleSkeletal radiology2021
Radiomics on radiography predicts giant cell tumor histologic response to denosumab.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- State of the Art and New Concepts in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Imaging Features and Tumor Characteristics.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDenosumab is an established targeted systemic therapy for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). We sought to determine whether treatment response could be quantified from radiomics analysis of radiographs taken longitudinally during treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsPre- and post-treatment radiographs of 10 GCTB tumors from 10 patients demonstrating histologic response after treatment with denosumab were analyzed. Intensity- and texture-based radiomics features for each manually segmented tumor were calculated. Radiomics features were compared pre- and post-treatment in tumors.
resultsMean intensity (p = 0.033) significantly increased while skewness (p = 0.028) significantly decreased after treatment. Post-treatment increases in fractal dimensions (p = 0.057) and abundance (p = 0.065) approached significance. A potential linear correlation in mean (p = 0.005; ΔMean = 0.022 * duration - 0.026) with treatment duration was observed.
conclusionRadiomics analysis of plain radiographs quantifies time-dependent matrix mineralization and trabecular reconstitution that mark positive response of giant cell tumors of bone to denosumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.