Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33733569›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2021

Mentality of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare workers about prenatal SARS-CoV-2 testing: A regional survey over the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

Hiroshi Kawamura, Makoto Orisaka, Yoshio Yoshida

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychological Distress and COVID-19 Related Anxiety among Malaysian Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi KawamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Makoto OrisakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Yoshio YoshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-0385
University of Fukui · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo clarify the mentality of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare workers about prenatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening testing.

methodsA multicenter questionnaire survey about prenatal SARS-CoV-2 screening testing was conducted among pregnant women, midwives and nurses (M&Ns), and obstetricians at all delivery facilities in Fukui Prefecture between June 30, 2020 and July 22, 2020.

resultsOf 297 pregnant women, 150 (50.5%) underwent prenatal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and 107 of them (71.3%) answered that because of prenatal PCR tests, they could give birth with relief. One hundred forty-five (48.8%) were concerned about the disadvantages of receiving positive prenatal PCR results. Of 287 M&Ns, 151 (52.6%) answered that prenatal PCR screening testing could reduce anxiety about infection to themselves; this belief was more common among M&Ns working at the nonreception facility than among those at COVID-19 reception facilities (60.7% vs. 47.1%, P = 0.02). Of 57 obstetricians, 31 (54.4%) agreed to prenatal SARS-CoV-2 PCR screening testing, the rate of which was significantly higher among obstetricians at nonreception facilities than those at reception facilities (70.3% vs. 25.0%, P < 0.01). Fourteen obstetricians (24.6%) were concerned about excessive medical treatment for asymptomatic pregnant women with false-positive PCR results.

conclusionsPregnant women experience anxieties during the COVID-19 pandemic, and prenatal SARS-CoV-2 screening may reduce their anxiety to some extent. However, obstetrics staff at COVID-19 reception facilities are aware of the limits of prenatal screening and are concerned about excessive medical intervention due to false-positive results.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansJapanPandemicsPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2coronavirus disease 2019pregnancySARS-CoV-2screeningsurvey

Identifiers

PMID33733569
PMCPMC8250815
OpenAlexW3137864996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.