Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33733430›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2021

Red, Yellow, and Green Light Changes: Adaptations to Extension Health Promotion Programs.

Laura E Balis, Lauren E Kennedy, Bailey Houghtaling, Samantha M Harden

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Racial and Ethnic Representation in Preventive Intervention Research: a Methodological Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  5. Influence of Classroom-Level Factors on Implementation Fidelity During Scale-up of Evidence-Based Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura E BalisBalis Consulting Group, LLC, WY, Lander, USA. laura@balisconsulting.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8981-1621
Lauren E KennedyMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Bailey HoughtalingLouisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Samantha M HardenVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, VA, Blacksburg, USA.
Ball (France) · FRLouisiana State University · USMichigan State University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extension professionals have high autonomy to adapt the programs they deliver. However, fidelity is typically not reported, so it is unknown what adaptations are made. It is also unknown whether agents have the necessary training to adapt programs while maintaining fidelity to the core components. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) adaptations that Extension agents and specialists are making to programs they deliver, (2) the reasons for making these adaptations, (3) timing of adaptations, and (4) Extension agents' and specialists' understanding of the adaptation process. Extension agents and specialists nationwide were invited to complete a survey which queried about adaptations based on the traffic light model, adaptome, and adaptation taxonomy. Specifically, the traffic light model assigns a color for adaptations: tailoring language or pictures (green), adding/substituting activities or session sequence (yellow), or deleting lessons and decreasing timeline or session length (red). Responses were received from 98 agents and 24 specialists. Most agents and specialists reported making green (85% and 79%, respectively), yellow (89% and 75%), and red light changes (81% and 58%). Agents were significantly more likely than specialists to change the age appropriateness of lessons or activities, respond to individual client needs, substitute activities, delete lessons or activities, decrease the length and/or number of sessions, and shorten the program timeline. Within green light changes, each of those that could increase cultural appropriateness (tailoring language, scenarios, and pictures) were reported by less than 50% of agents and specialists. Of the most common adaptations reported, the primary reasons for these decisions were difficulty retaining or engaging participants and lack of time/competing demands on time. Most adaptations were made before the program was delivered. Agents rated their confidence level in the program adaptation process as somewhat confident to confident. Dissemination and implementation strategies to improve program adaptation within Extension are needed, including participatory approaches, training on the adaptation process, bi-directional evidence-based program repositories, and organizational-level changes.

Indexed as

Health PromotionHumansAdaptationCooperative Extension SystemFidelity

Identifiers

PMID33733430
OpenAlexW3135969376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.