Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33733418›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited.

Gokay Canberk Bulus, Suleyman Koc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Roadmap for carbon neutrality: the mediating role of clean energy development-related investments.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Do foreign direct investment inflows affect environmental degradation in BRICS nations?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gokay Canberk BulusDepartment of Economics, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Turkey. gcbulus@aksaray.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5313-6759
Suleyman KocDepartment of Economics, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6976-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper uses the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) to examine the effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) and government expenditures on environmental quality in Korea. For this purpose, we conducted autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing for the period 1970-2018. Empirical results indicate that in Korea, increased FDI, per capita gross domestic product (GDP), energy use, and imports have led to increased per capita carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

Economic DevelopmentHealth ExpendituresCarbon DioxideEnvironmental PollutionGovernmentInvestmentsRepublic of KoreaCarbon DioxideARDL bounds testingCO2 emissionsEconomic growthForeign direct investmentGovernment expendituresKorea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.