Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33733212›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2020

Adjusting for Conditional Bias in Process Model Simulations of Hydrological Extremes: An Experiment Using the North Wyke Farm Platform.

Stelian Curceac, Peter M Atkinson, Alice Milne, Lianhai Wu, Paul Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stelian CurceacRothamsted Research, Department of Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Devon, United Kingdom.
Peter M AtkinsonLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Alice MilneRothamsted Research, Department of Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Lianhai WuRothamsted Research, Department of Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Devon, United Kingdom.
Paul HarrisRothamsted Research, Department of Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Devon, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000I0320Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000I0330Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000J0100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peak flow events can lead to flooding which can have negative impacts on human life and ecosystem services. Therefore, accurate forecasting of such peak flows is important. Physically-based process models are commonly used to simulate water flow, but they often under-predict peak events (i.e., are conditionally biased), undermining their suitability for use in flood forecasting. In this research, we explored methods to increase the accuracy of peak flow simulations from a process-based model by combining the model's output with: a) a semi-parametric conditional extreme model and b) an extreme learning machine model. The proposed 3-model hybrid approach was evaluated using fine temporal resolution water flow data from a sub-catchment of the North Wyke Farm Platform, a grassland research station in south-west England, United Kingdom. The hybrid model was assessed objectively against its simpler constituent models using a jackknife evaluation procedure with several error and agreement indices. The proposed hybrid approach was better able to capture the dynamics of the flow process and, thereby, increase prediction accuracy of the peak flow events.

Indexed as

conditional extreme modelextreme learning machinegrassland agriculturehybridpeak flowprocess-based model

Identifiers

PMID33733212
PMCPMC7861266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.