Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33732980›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2021

An International Delphi Survey on Exercise Priorities in CKD.

Mary Labib, Clara Bohm, Jennifer M MacRae, Paul N Bennett, Kenneth R Wilund, Mara McAdams-DeMarco, Manisha Jhamb, Stefan Mustata, Stephanie Thompson, Global Renal EXercise Network

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mary LabibDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Clara BohmDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jennifer M MacRaeCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Paul N BennettMedical Clinical Affairs, Satellite Healthcare, San Jose, California, USA.
Kenneth R WilundDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Mara McAdams-DeMarcoDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Manisha JhambRenal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stefan MustataCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Stephanie ThompsonDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Global Renal EXercise Network
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDefining the role of exercise in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a top research priority for people with CKD. We aimed to achieve consensus on specific research priorities in exercise and CKD among an international panel of stakeholders.

methodsUsing the Delphi method, patients/caregivers, researchers, clinicians, and policymakers submitted their top research priorities in round 1 and ranked their importance in rounds 2 and 3 using a 9-point Likert scale. The mean, median, and proportion of scores ranked 7 to 9 were calculated. Consensus was defined as priorities that scored above the overall mean and median score within each stakeholder panel. Qualitative description was used to understand participants' rankings.

resultsSeventy participants (78% response) completed round 1: 15 (21.4%) clinicians, 33 (47.1%) researchers, 13 (18.6%) policymakers, and 9 (12.9%) patients; (85.7%) completed round 3. The top research priorities were defining exercise-related outcomes meaningful to patients, identifying patients' motivation and perspective towards exercise, understanding the effect of exercise on the risk of institutionalization, mortality, and mobility, and understanding the effect of pre- and post-transplant exercise on postoperative recovery. Themes from the qualitative analysis were individualization, personal experience, and holistic approach to exercise (patients), the need to address common clinical problems (clinicians), developing targeted interventions (researchers), and the importance of evidence-based development versus implementation (policymakers).

conclusionsPreventing physical disability was a common priority. Policymakers emphasized that more efficacy studies were needed. Other panels expressed the need for holistic and targeted exercise interventions and for outcomes that address common clinical problems.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseDelphiexerciseoutcomesresearch prioritiessurvey

Identifiers

PMID33732980
PMCPMC7938076
OpenAlexW3111343907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.