ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2021
Neuromuscular ultrasound of the scapular stabilisers in healthy subjects.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo obtain normative high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) data for thickness of the serratus anterior, the trapezius and the rhomboid major muscles and diameter of their corresponding nerves, the long thoracic, the spinal accessory and the dorsal scapular nerve. Moreover, we aimed to examine intra- and inter-examiner agreement of the HRUS measurements.
methodsWe included 41 healthy subjects. Muscle thickness and nerve diameter were measured bilaterally, resulting in 82 ultrasound measurements for each structure. Normative data were calculated using regression equations for the lower limit of muscle thickness and upper limit of nerve diameter, taking into account various variables. For intra- and inter-examiner agreement, ten subjects underwent two extra ultrasound examinations and Bland-Altman plots were calculated.
resultsThis normative data set showed significant correlations between decreasing muscle thickness with increasing age and height and increasing muscle thickness with increasing weight and with male sex. Muscle thickness was larger on the dominant side compared to the non-dominant side for the trapezius and rhomboid muscles, whereas the opposite was found for the serratus anterior muscle. For all nerves, significant correlations were found between decreasing nerve diameter with increasing age and height. Intra-examiner agreement was acceptable in all sites. Inter-examiner agreement was acceptable for all sites but one site for the serratus anterior muscle and long thoracic nerve, and not acceptable for five out of six sites for the trapezius muscle.
conclusionThis study provides HRUS normative data and intra- and inter-examiner agreement data for muscle thickness and nerve diameter for the muscles stabilizing the scapulae and their corresponding nerves. SIGNIFICANCE: The normative HRUS data reported may be useful in future studies investigating neuromuscular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.