Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33732894›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2021

World Health Organization building blocks in rural community health services: An integrative review.

Deborah A Stockton, Cathrine Fowler, Deborah Debono, Joanne Travaglia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Telepharmacy in Nigeria: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development of a framework for the collaborative adaptation of service models for child and family health in diverse settings (CASCADES).Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024
    Article
  14. The impact of rural status on pediatric chronic kidney disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using mixed methods to understand and tackle barriers to accessing health services.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deborah A StocktonCentre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-949X
Cathrine FowlerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.
Deborah DebonoCentre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.
Joanne TravagliaCentre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDeveloping and adapting health service models to effectively meet the needs of rural and remote communities is an international priority given inequities in health outcomes compared with metropolitan counterparts. This integrative review aims to inform rural and remote health service delivery systems by drawing on the WHO Framework building blocks to identify lessons learned from the literature describing experiences of rural and remote community health service planning and implementation; and inform recommendations to strengthen often disadvantaged rural and remote health systems for policy makers, health service managers, and those implementing international healthcare initiatives within these contexts.

methodsThe integrative review examined the literature reporting rural and remote community health service delivery published from 2007 to 2017 (the decade following the release of the WHO Framework). Using an analytic frame, a structured template was developed to extract data and categorized against the WHO building blocks, followed by a synthesis of the key findings.

resultsThis integrative review identified that WHO Framework building blocks such as "Service Delivery" and "Health Workforce" are commonly reflected in rural and remote community health service delivery literature in the decade since the Framework's release. However, others such as "Sustainable Funding and Social Protection" are less commonly reported in the literature despite these elements being identified by the WHO as being integral to successful, sustainable health service delivery systems.

conclusionsWe found that collaboration across the health system governance continuum from local to policy level is an essential enabler for rural and remote health service delivery. Community-based participatory action research provides an opportunity to learn from one another, build capacity, optimize service model suitability, and promotes cultural safety by demonstrating respect and inclusivity in decision-making. Policy makers and funders need to acknowledge the time and resources required to build trust and community coalitions to inform effective planning and implementation.

Indexed as

community healthhealth planningintegrative reviewremote healthrural healthservice models

Identifiers

PMID33732894
PMCPMC7942400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.