ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2021
Genomic profiling of endometrial cancer and relationship with volume of endometrial cancer disease spread.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLymph node (LN) metastasis and genomic profiles are important prognostic factors in endometrial cancer (EMCA). However, the prognostic significance of low volume metastasis found in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is unknown. We sought to determine if genomic mutations were associated with metastatic volume.
methodsSurgically staged women with EC who were enrolled in both a SLN clinical trial and tumor sequencing protocol were eligible. Relevant targets were enriched by a custom designed Agilent SureSelect hybrid capture enrichment library using standard protocols. Three specific gene mutations were evaluated,
results42 patients were eligible; of these, 7 (16.7%) had ITC only and 7 (16.7%) had micrometastatic or macrometastatic (LN positive) disease. No differences were seen in TP53,
conclusionsThis pilot investigation did not identify differences between frequency of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.