Assessment of Physician's Knowledge of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions: An Online Survey in China.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Potentially harmful drug-drug interactions in the therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2024
   Observational
2. Factors associated with a basic common drug-drug interaction knowledge among emergency department medical personnel.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2022
   Article
3. South African healthcare workers' knowledge of dolutegravir's drug-drug interactions in the first year of its rollout: a cross-sectional online survey.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022
   Article
4. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Self-Medication Among the Pediatric Population in China: A National Survey.Frontiers in public health · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as